Why Peter Obi avoided debate with me — Umahi



The Minister of Works, David Umahi, has said the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, declined his invitation to a public debate because he knew he could not win a comparison of their records in public office.Umahi made the claim in a statement issued on Sunday by his Senior Special Assistant on Media, Francis Nwaze, while responding to Obi’s recent remarks dismissing the minister’s challenge.The minister had earlier invited Obi to a debate focused on their respective performances as governors.Both politicians were two-term former governors.However, Obi, during an interview with media entrepreneur Chude Jideonwo, said Umahi must first become a presidential candidate before inviting him to such an engagement.Obi argued that presidential debates were meant for presidential candidates.The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. Umahi made the claim in a statement issued on Sunday by his Senior Special Assistant on Media, Francis Nwaze, while responding to Obi’s recent remarks dismissing the minister’s challenge.The minister had earlier invited Obi to a debate focused on their respective performances as governors.Both politicians were two-term former governors.However, Obi, during an interview with media entrepreneur Chude Jideonwo, said Umahi must first become a presidential candidate before inviting him to such an engagement.Obi argued that presidential debates were meant for presidential candidates.The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. The minister had earlier invited Obi to a debate focused on their respective performances as governors.Both politicians were two-term former governors.However, Obi, during an interview with media entrepreneur Chude Jideonwo, said Umahi must first become a presidential candidate before inviting him to such an engagement.Obi argued that presidential debates were meant for presidential candidates.The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. Both politicians were two-term former governors.However, Obi, during an interview with media entrepreneur Chude Jideonwo, said Umahi must first become a presidential candidate before inviting him to such an engagement.Obi argued that presidential debates were meant for presidential candidates.The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. However, Obi, during an interview with media entrepreneur Chude Jideonwo, said Umahi must first become a presidential candidate before inviting him to such an engagement.Obi argued that presidential debates were meant for presidential candidates.The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. Obi argued that presidential debates were meant for presidential candidates.The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. The former Anambra governor likened the situation to a football team that qualified for the FIFA World Cup being challenged by one that failed to qualify.The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi. Photo: X | Peter Obi.Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. Responding, Umahi said the proposed debate was never about political ambition or electoral status but about accountability and governance.“Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “Many Nigerians expected what could have been one of the most consequential conversations on public service in recent times. Instead, Mr. Obi declined the invitation, explaining that he is currently a presidential candidate while Senator Umahi is not.“Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “Yet the challenge was never about electoral status. It was about accountability. It was about inviting two former governors to present their records before Nigerians and allow the public to judge whose leadership produced the greater impact.“If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “If governance is measured by performance, political ambition should not prevent an honest comparison of records,” the statement said.Related NewsAPGA holds national women’s summit, seeks greater inclusion in politics, governanceAPC chieftain, PDP clash over Adebutu’s emergence as Ogun gov candidateYour voices matter in credible elections, Obi tells diaspora AfricansThe minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. The minister argued that his public service experience extended beyond his tenure as governor of Ebonyi State, citing his roles as state party chairman, deputy governor, governor, Chairman of the South-East Governors’ Forum, Co-Chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, senator and Minister of Works.“By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “By contrast, Peter Obi’s highest elective public office and entire experience has been Governor of Anambra State. Beyond that, he has not held any other executive or legislative public office. Not party chairman, not minister, and never a senator.“At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “At every stage, Umahi’s leadership was tested through elections, public scrutiny and increasing national responsibility,” the statement added.Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. Umahi also highlighted projects executed during his administration in Ebonyi State, including roads, flyovers, bridges, hospitals, schools and other public infrastructure, as well as ongoing federal road projects under his supervision as Minister of Works.The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. The minister criticised Obi’s emphasis on fiscal savings during his tenure as governor of Anambra State, arguing that governance should be assessed by tangible development and completed projects.“Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “Keeping money in the bank while leaving contractors unpaid and failing to complete meaningful, life-impacting projects cannot, by itself, be regarded as an achievement. Ultimately, leadership is measured by the tangible improvements it delivers to the lives of the people,” the statement said.Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. Umahi also alleged that Obi governed Anambra State for most of his eight-year tenure without democratically elected local government chairmen, relying instead on caretaker committees until local government elections were held shortly before he left office.The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. The minister maintained that he remained willing to participate in a debate on any credible platform.“One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “One cannot credibly aspire to lead a nation as complex and demanding as Nigeria without a demonstrable record of performance as a governor.“Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “Likewise, it is difficult to convince Nigerians that you are prepared to challenge an administration led by a focused and determined President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when you are not even a match and cannot stand a debate with one of the key leaders of that administration on the basis of verifiable performance and achievements.“Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added. “Nigerians deserve the opportunity to evaluate records,” the statement added.