Chief Imam of Al-Hikmah University, Ilorin, and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Islamic Studies, Dr Sanusi Lafiagi, tells DARE AKOGUN why Nigeria should reject amnesty for captured terrorists, insisting that repentance does not erase criminal liability. He explains the Islamic position on forgiveness, advocates special courts for terrorism and kidnapping cases, and argues that justice, not rehabilitation, remains the surest path to lasting peaceSecurity agencies have repeatedly suggested that repentant bandits and terrorists who surrender should be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society, but you have strongly opposed this. Why?I do not support that proposal at all. It is morally wrong and deeply unjust. Anyone who has engaged in kidnapping, banditry, or terrorism has committed grave crimes against innocent Nigerians. Such people do not deserve rehabilitation; they deserve justice.From the perspective of Islam, those who wage violent aggression against society through kidnapping, banditry, armed robbery, or terrorism fall under the provisions of Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 33, which prescribes severe punishment for those who spread violence and corruption on earth.The Qur’an states that the recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is severe punishment. That reflects how seriously Islam views crimes that threaten public safety.When people who commit acts of terrorism are apprehended on the battlefield after confronting security forces, they should face the full weight of the law.Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Security agencies have repeatedly suggested that repentant bandits and terrorists who surrender should be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society, but you have strongly opposed this. Why?I do not support that proposal at all. It is morally wrong and deeply unjust. Anyone who has engaged in kidnapping, banditry, or terrorism has committed grave crimes against innocent Nigerians. Such people do not deserve rehabilitation; they deserve justice.From the perspective of Islam, those who wage violent aggression against society through kidnapping, banditry, armed robbery, or terrorism fall under the provisions of Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 33, which prescribes severe punishment for those who spread violence and corruption on earth.The Qur’an states that the recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is severe punishment. That reflects how seriously Islam views crimes that threaten public safety.When people who commit acts of terrorism are apprehended on the battlefield after confronting security forces, they should face the full weight of the law.Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. I do not support that proposal at all. It is morally wrong and deeply unjust. Anyone who has engaged in kidnapping, banditry, or terrorism has committed grave crimes against innocent Nigerians. Such people do not deserve rehabilitation; they deserve justice.From the perspective of Islam, those who wage violent aggression against society through kidnapping, banditry, armed robbery, or terrorism fall under the provisions of Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 33, which prescribes severe punishment for those who spread violence and corruption on earth.The Qur’an states that the recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is severe punishment. That reflects how seriously Islam views crimes that threaten public safety.When people who commit acts of terrorism are apprehended on the battlefield after confronting security forces, they should face the full weight of the law.Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. From the perspective of Islam, those who wage violent aggression against society through kidnapping, banditry, armed robbery, or terrorism fall under the provisions of Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 33, which prescribes severe punishment for those who spread violence and corruption on earth.The Qur’an states that the recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is severe punishment. That reflects how seriously Islam views crimes that threaten public safety.When people who commit acts of terrorism are apprehended on the battlefield after confronting security forces, they should face the full weight of the law.Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. The Qur’an states that the recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread mischief in the land is severe punishment. That reflects how seriously Islam views crimes that threaten public safety.When people who commit acts of terrorism are apprehended on the battlefield after confronting security forces, they should face the full weight of the law.Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. When people who commit acts of terrorism are apprehended on the battlefield after confronting security forces, they should face the full weight of the law.Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Granting amnesty to people who murdered innocent citizens, destroyed communities, and abducted families only deepens the pain of victims. It wounds the conscience of a nation that has already suffered enough.Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Does that mean Islam completely rejects rehabilitation for terrorists?No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. No. Islam recognises repentance, but repentance has conditions. The very next verse, Qur’an Chapter 5, Verse 34, makes an exception for those who genuinely repent before they are apprehended.There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. There is a significant difference between someone who voluntarily lays down their weapons out of sincere remorse and someone who surrenders only after being overpowered by the military. Islam permits rehabilitation for those who willingly abandon violence before arrest. However, repentance does not erase accountability.If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. If such a person has committed murder, the rights of the victims remain. Islamic law provides for ‘Diya,’ or blood compensation. Repentance does not cancel the rights of families whose loved ones were killed.If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. If the government chooses to rehabilitate such individuals, it must also ensure justice for victims, including compensation where applicable. Nobody should simply walk away from crimes as though nothing happened.Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Why do you believe the Federal Government’s rehabilitation programme has not achieved its intended objective?To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. To a very large extent, it has not been effective. We have repeatedly seen people who surrendered return to the forests after receiving rehabilitation. Sometimes, when security agencies are close to defeating them, they pretend to surrender, receive government assistance, regroup, rearm, and return with even greater attacks.The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. The government must understand that not every criminal can be deradicalised. The first question should be, “What exactly are these people fighting for?” If someone belongs to Boko Haram because of a particular ideological belief, then scholars, psychologists, and security experts can work together to challenge that ideology intellectually. That is genuine deradicalisation.But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. But what about someone who kidnaps simply because kidnapping has become a lucrative business? What about someone who commits crimes while under the influence of drugs? How do you deradicalise greed? How do you rehabilitate someone whose criminality has become an enterprise? The government must properly profile those involved before applying a blanket policy to everybody.Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Are you saying the government should distinguish between ideological extremists and ordinary criminals?Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Exactly. Many people involved in kidnapping today are not pursuing any political or ideological cause. Some are drug addicts. Some simply discovered that kidnapping generates quick money. Others are connected to illegal mining activities and use insecurity as a cover to exploit Nigeria’s natural resources.Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Some are even foreigners who see Nigeria as a fertile ground for organised crime. The government must separate ideological extremists from economic criminals because the solutions are different. One policy cannot solve every problem.Related NewsOyo abduction: Inside operation that freed pupils, teachers after 56 days in captivityThree Mexicans, seven others remanded over N480bn meth labTroops foil attempted ISWAP raid in BornoSome security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Some security experts argue that rehabilitation encourages fighters to surrender, thereby reducing violence. Why do you disagree?I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. I disagree because it sends the wrong message. Instead of discouraging criminality, it may encourage others to take up arms, believing that they will eventually receive amnesty. The government should never make violent crime appear rewarding. There must always be consequences. Without consequences, deterrence disappears.What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. What impact do you think this policy has on victims of terrorism and banditry?It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. It reopens old wounds. Across Nigeria, thousands of families have lost fathers, mothers, and children. Many women became widows. Many children became orphans. Entire communities have been displaced. Farmers cannot return to their farms. Businesses have collapsed.Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Imagine asking such victims to welcome back the very people responsible for their suffering after rehabilitation. How can families worship alongside those who killed their loved ones? How can communities trust such people again? Justice must first be seen to have been done.You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. You have proposed the establishment of special courts for kidnapping and terrorism cases. Why are they necessary?Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Because justice delayed weakens public confidence. Kidnapping and terrorism cases often remain in court for years. That is unacceptable. Special courts backed by appropriate legislation should handle only kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry cases.Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Judges should receive specialised training. Trials should be conducted within clearly defined timelines while fully respecting constitutional safeguards and the rights of defendants. Justice must be speedy, but it must also remain fair.Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Some human rights advocates argue that severe punishments, including the death penalty, do not necessarily deter crime and may result in miscarriages of justice. How do you respond?Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Human rights are important. Islam also values justice and human dignity. Society also has a responsibility to protect innocent citizens. No one should be punished without credible evidence and due process.That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. That is why investigations must be thorough, and trials must be fair. However, once guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, the law must take its course. Compassion should never replace justice. Repentance is between the individual and God, but accountability before society remains necessary.Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Do you believe tougher punishment and special courts can restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system?Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Certainly! When citizens see criminals prosecuted swiftly and fairly, confidence in the government increases. People want assurance that the law protects innocent lives. If criminals know there are real consequences for kidnapping and terrorism, many will think twice before committing such crimes. Justice is one of the strongest foundations of peace.Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Beyond government, what role should religious leaders and institutions play in addressing insecurity?Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Religious leaders have enormous responsibilities. Firstly, we must continue preaching against violence and criminality. Secondly, we should support victims spiritually, emotionally, and materially. Thirdly, we must educate young people against extremism and drug abuse. Religious institutions should also collaborate with the government, security agencies, and communities to promote peace while upholding justice.Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Finally, if the government continues to prioritise rehabilitation without strengthening justice mechanisms, what do you fear could happen?Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Nigerians may gradually lose confidence in the justice system. Victims will feel abandoned. Communities may begin seeking self-help because they no longer trust government institutions. That is dangerous for any nation. The government’s primary responsibility is the protection of lives and property.Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Rather than focusing mainly on amnesty programmes, the government should strengthen intelligence gathering, equip security agencies, support lawful community security initiatives, prosecute offenders swiftly through special courts, and ensure that justice is done.Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. Only then will Nigerians regain confidence that the country is genuinely committed to ending kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry.