NINETEEN years after the enactment of the National Identity Management Commission Act, Nigeria has taken a significant step towards unifying its fragmented identity ecosystem. With President Bola Tinubu’s signing of the amended NIMC Act on June 26, the commission now has a broader legal mandate to harmonise identity records of Nigerians, strengthen digital authentication and curb identity theft.The repeal of the 2007 law and its replacement with a more expansive legal framework reflect the increasing centrality of digital identity to governance, commerce and national security. If properly implemented, the law could become one of the most consequential institutional reforms in Nigeria’s digital transformation.The amended Act designates the NIMC as the Root Certification Authority for Nigeria’s National Public Key Infrastructure and Digital Public Infrastructure. This gives the commission statutory authority to manage secure electronic signatures, authentication systems and digital trust services, providing the legal foundation for secure digital transactions across the country.More importantly, it makes the National Identity Number compulsory across 14 critical sectors of national life, including banking, passport issuance, land transactions, pensions, voter registration, tax administration and business registration.In a country where citizens have long endured multiple identity registrations for banking, elections, telecommunications and other public services, the law seeks to bring disparate databases under its umbrella.This harmonisation should simplify identity verification, eliminate duplication and improve service delivery.It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The repeal of the 2007 law and its replacement with a more expansive legal framework reflect the increasing centrality of digital identity to governance, commerce and national security. If properly implemented, the law could become one of the most consequential institutional reforms in Nigeria’s digital transformation.The amended Act designates the NIMC as the Root Certification Authority for Nigeria’s National Public Key Infrastructure and Digital Public Infrastructure. This gives the commission statutory authority to manage secure electronic signatures, authentication systems and digital trust services, providing the legal foundation for secure digital transactions across the country.More importantly, it makes the National Identity Number compulsory across 14 critical sectors of national life, including banking, passport issuance, land transactions, pensions, voter registration, tax administration and business registration.In a country where citizens have long endured multiple identity registrations for banking, elections, telecommunications and other public services, the law seeks to bring disparate databases under its umbrella.This harmonisation should simplify identity verification, eliminate duplication and improve service delivery.It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The amended Act designates the NIMC as the Root Certification Authority for Nigeria’s National Public Key Infrastructure and Digital Public Infrastructure. This gives the commission statutory authority to manage secure electronic signatures, authentication systems and digital trust services, providing the legal foundation for secure digital transactions across the country.More importantly, it makes the National Identity Number compulsory across 14 critical sectors of national life, including banking, passport issuance, land transactions, pensions, voter registration, tax administration and business registration.In a country where citizens have long endured multiple identity registrations for banking, elections, telecommunications and other public services, the law seeks to bring disparate databases under its umbrella.This harmonisation should simplify identity verification, eliminate duplication and improve service delivery.It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. More importantly, it makes the National Identity Number compulsory across 14 critical sectors of national life, including banking, passport issuance, land transactions, pensions, voter registration, tax administration and business registration.In a country where citizens have long endured multiple identity registrations for banking, elections, telecommunications and other public services, the law seeks to bring disparate databases under its umbrella.This harmonisation should simplify identity verification, eliminate duplication and improve service delivery.It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. In a country where citizens have long endured multiple identity registrations for banking, elections, telecommunications and other public services, the law seeks to bring disparate databases under its umbrella.This harmonisation should simplify identity verification, eliminate duplication and improve service delivery.It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. This harmonisation should simplify identity verification, eliminate duplication and improve service delivery.It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. It also supports the government’s objective of improving the Ease of Doing Business. Nigeria currently ranks a poor 131st out of 190 economies in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index, underscoring the need for reforms that reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks.Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Essentially, the amended law upgrades Nigeria’s identity architecture by making the NIN the foundational credential for accessing critical public and private services.It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. It promotes seamless, secure and interoperable data exchange among government agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Nigeria Immigration Service, while extending interoperability to private organisations. Done properly, this should eliminate costly redundancies and improve administrative efficiency.Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Equally significant is the law’s alignment of the NIMC with the Nigeria Data Protection Act. Citizens’ explicit consent is now required before personal data can be accessed or processed.This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. This is a welcome safeguard. It should help curb the activities of hackers, identity thieves and online fraudsters while preventing unauthorised access to sensitive personal information.Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Before this amendment, weak legal safeguards exposed many unsuspecting Nigerians to identity theft, fraud and privacy violations. Corporate organisations with a penchant for illegally harvesting or exploiting citizens’ personal data should now face severe consequences.The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The law could help prevent a recurrence of incidents such as the unlawful publication of the voter details of Nollywood actor Emeka Ike by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The Nigeria Police Force has arrested an ad hoc staff member of INEC over the leak. That case must be pursued to its logical conclusion.Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Under the amended Act, unauthorised access to personal data, identity theft and multiple registrations now attract stiff sanctions, including corporate fines of up to N20 million and a minimum prison term of five years.These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. These penalties will serve as effective deterrents only if they are rigorously enforced. Accordingly, the judiciary should expedite the trial of offenders to reinforce public confidence in the new legal regime.Related News2027: INEC vows every vote will countWeightlifters shoulder Nigeria’s Glasgow campaignOyetola warns of digital shipping disputes aheadHowever, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. However, punishment alone is insufficient. The government must also establish mechanisms to mitigate the often irreversible psychological, financial and reputational damage suffered by victims of identity theft and data breaches.The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The expanded powers conferred on the NIMC also carry substantial responsibilities. As the Root Certification Authority overseeing the exchange of data among Ministries, Departments and Agencies, private institutions and international security networks, the commission has a critical role in combating terrorism, strengthening border security and tracking transnational criminal activities.Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Yet these legitimate security objectives must not become a pretext for violating citizens’ constitutional right to privacy.The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The broad surveillance and information-sharing powers embedded in the law require stronger safeguards against abuse. These loopholes remain in the amended Act and deserve further scrutiny by the National Assembly.There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. There are also legitimate concerns about implementation. Making the NIN mandatory for virtually every essential service places enormous pressure on the NIMC’s digital infrastructure.Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Unless its servers, databases and telecommunications networks are significantly upgraded, Nigerians may face avoidable delays and disruptions in accessing banking services, telecommunications, credit facilities and other essential services.Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Nigeria undoubtedly needs a secure, integrated national identity database. However, such a database must be insulated from illegal access, political interference and abuse by government institutions and security agencies.Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Public trust will depend not only on technological efficiency but also on institutional accountability.The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The deployment of the NIN should ultimately eliminate multiple registrations and consolidate them into a single, reliable identity system. That objective is both necessary and achievable.Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Other democracies have taken different approaches. Following the Identity Documents Act 2010, the United Kingdom abolished its National Identity Register and removed the requirement for citizens to carry identity cards.Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Britons instead rely on voluntary identity documents such as passports, photocard driving licences and birth certificates for proof of identity.Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Nigeria has chosen a different path. That choice imposes an even greater obligation on the authorities to ensure that the identity system is transparent, secure and respectful of civil liberties.Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Above all, the Tinubu administration must never weaponise the NIMC’s expanded powers against critics, political opponents or dissenting voices.As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. As the country approaches the 2027 general elections, using the national identity database to facilitate electoral manipulation or rigging would constitute a grave violation of the 1999 Constitution and undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. Likewise, the Independent National Electoral Commission and other public agencies can no longer hide behind claims of inadequate legal authority.The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour. The amended Act provides them with a stronger legal framework to investigate, prosecute and punish identity-related offences. They must now demonstrate the political will to enforce it without fear or favour.