Premier League refereeing body Pro Ref has admitted an “error of judgement” over Erling Haaland’s winning goal in Manchester City’s 1-0 victory against Manchester United.The striker scored in the 60th minute at Old Trafford, turning home at the back post from Josko Gvardiol’s cross before it was disallowed on the field for offside.The goal was initially ruled out for offside before VAR intervened and overturned the decision.The Norwegian striker was ultimately deemed to have been played onside by the boot of United defender Patrick Dorgu.Related NewsHow Olise was rejected by Arsenal, Chelsea before Bayern stardom – ReportsFULL LIST: Top 10 scorers in Manchester derby historyHaaland fires 10-man Man City to memorable win over Man UtdBut there was debate as to whether the offside Enzo Fernandez, diving at the ball in a more central position than Haaland, was interfering with play.As reported by BBC Sport on Sunday, in a statement, Pro Ref said: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective.“However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” The striker scored in the 60th minute at Old Trafford, turning home at the back post from Josko Gvardiol’s cross before it was disallowed on the field for offside.The goal was initially ruled out for offside before VAR intervened and overturned the decision.The Norwegian striker was ultimately deemed to have been played onside by the boot of United defender Patrick Dorgu.Related NewsHow Olise was rejected by Arsenal, Chelsea before Bayern stardom – ReportsFULL LIST: Top 10 scorers in Manchester derby historyHaaland fires 10-man Man City to memorable win over Man UtdBut there was debate as to whether the offside Enzo Fernandez, diving at the ball in a more central position than Haaland, was interfering with play.As reported by BBC Sport on Sunday, in a statement, Pro Ref said: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective.“However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” The goal was initially ruled out for offside before VAR intervened and overturned the decision.The Norwegian striker was ultimately deemed to have been played onside by the boot of United defender Patrick Dorgu.Related NewsHow Olise was rejected by Arsenal, Chelsea before Bayern stardom – ReportsFULL LIST: Top 10 scorers in Manchester derby historyHaaland fires 10-man Man City to memorable win over Man UtdBut there was debate as to whether the offside Enzo Fernandez, diving at the ball in a more central position than Haaland, was interfering with play.As reported by BBC Sport on Sunday, in a statement, Pro Ref said: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective.“However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” The Norwegian striker was ultimately deemed to have been played onside by the boot of United defender Patrick Dorgu.Related NewsHow Olise was rejected by Arsenal, Chelsea before Bayern stardom – ReportsFULL LIST: Top 10 scorers in Manchester derby historyHaaland fires 10-man Man City to memorable win over Man UtdBut there was debate as to whether the offside Enzo Fernandez, diving at the ball in a more central position than Haaland, was interfering with play.As reported by BBC Sport on Sunday, in a statement, Pro Ref said: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective.“However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” But there was debate as to whether the offside Enzo Fernandez, diving at the ball in a more central position than Haaland, was interfering with play.As reported by BBC Sport on Sunday, in a statement, Pro Ref said: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective.“However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” As reported by BBC Sport on Sunday, in a statement, Pro Ref said: “It was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective.“However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” “However, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.” “Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”