On August 15, Osun State will take centre stage in the country. All eyes will be on the South-West state where residents are expected to elect their governor. They will decide whether to retain the incumbent, Ademola Adeleke of the Accord Party and formerly of the Peoples Democratic Party, or to give another person the opportunity to lead the state. Going by the political calculations, public sentiments and campaigns so far, the election promises to be one of the most closely contested governorship elections in recent years.But beyond the personalities and political parties lies a far more important issue: whether the election will be conducted in a manner that truly reflects the will of the people. Unfortunately, disturbing developments in the build-up to the poll suggest that the greatest threat to the election may not be the strength of any candidate, but the possibility of violence, intimidation and attempts to compromise the integrity of the electoral process.Osun has always occupied a strategic place in Nigeria’s political landscape. Governorship elections in the state often attract national attention because of the state’s rich political history and the tendency of its elections to resonate beyond its borders. During the last governorship election in the state, Adeleke defeated the then-sitting governor, Gboyega Oyetola, denying him the opportunity of a second term in office. That outcome altered the political equation in the state and had implications for the larger political calculations in the South-West.The outcome of this election could also shape political calculations ahead of the 2027 general elections. This is more than a state election; it is another important test of Nigeria’s democracy. The conduct of the election, more than even its outcome, will provide an indication of the country’s democratic maturity and the willingness of institutions to uphold the will of the people.Unlike elections in some other states where one candidate appears overwhelmingly dominant, this race in Osun appears genuinely competitive. The incumbent must be working hard not to be served the same bitter pill he served Oyetola four years ago. The candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Oyebamiji, and his supporters will also be determined to reclaim the state for the ruling party. Given that the APC controls the Federal Government, it is expected that what has come to be known in Nigeria’s political lexicon as “federal might” may also feature in the contest.Of great concern, however, are some disturbing signs already emerging ahead of election day. There have been reports of political killings, violent clashes and acts of intimidation. Not surprisingly, all parties have been claiming to be victims, while none appears willing to accept responsibility. Such developments are dangerous because they create fear and tension among voters and raise concerns about the possibility of a peaceful election.The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. But beyond the personalities and political parties lies a far more important issue: whether the election will be conducted in a manner that truly reflects the will of the people. Unfortunately, disturbing developments in the build-up to the poll suggest that the greatest threat to the election may not be the strength of any candidate, but the possibility of violence, intimidation and attempts to compromise the integrity of the electoral process.Osun has always occupied a strategic place in Nigeria’s political landscape. Governorship elections in the state often attract national attention because of the state’s rich political history and the tendency of its elections to resonate beyond its borders. During the last governorship election in the state, Adeleke defeated the then-sitting governor, Gboyega Oyetola, denying him the opportunity of a second term in office. That outcome altered the political equation in the state and had implications for the larger political calculations in the South-West.The outcome of this election could also shape political calculations ahead of the 2027 general elections. This is more than a state election; it is another important test of Nigeria’s democracy. The conduct of the election, more than even its outcome, will provide an indication of the country’s democratic maturity and the willingness of institutions to uphold the will of the people.Unlike elections in some other states where one candidate appears overwhelmingly dominant, this race in Osun appears genuinely competitive. The incumbent must be working hard not to be served the same bitter pill he served Oyetola four years ago. The candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Oyebamiji, and his supporters will also be determined to reclaim the state for the ruling party. Given that the APC controls the Federal Government, it is expected that what has come to be known in Nigeria’s political lexicon as “federal might” may also feature in the contest.Of great concern, however, are some disturbing signs already emerging ahead of election day. There have been reports of political killings, violent clashes and acts of intimidation. Not surprisingly, all parties have been claiming to be victims, while none appears willing to accept responsibility. Such developments are dangerous because they create fear and tension among voters and raise concerns about the possibility of a peaceful election.The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Osun has always occupied a strategic place in Nigeria’s political landscape. Governorship elections in the state often attract national attention because of the state’s rich political history and the tendency of its elections to resonate beyond its borders. During the last governorship election in the state, Adeleke defeated the then-sitting governor, Gboyega Oyetola, denying him the opportunity of a second term in office. That outcome altered the political equation in the state and had implications for the larger political calculations in the South-West.The outcome of this election could also shape political calculations ahead of the 2027 general elections. This is more than a state election; it is another important test of Nigeria’s democracy. The conduct of the election, more than even its outcome, will provide an indication of the country’s democratic maturity and the willingness of institutions to uphold the will of the people.Unlike elections in some other states where one candidate appears overwhelmingly dominant, this race in Osun appears genuinely competitive. The incumbent must be working hard not to be served the same bitter pill he served Oyetola four years ago. The candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Oyebamiji, and his supporters will also be determined to reclaim the state for the ruling party. Given that the APC controls the Federal Government, it is expected that what has come to be known in Nigeria’s political lexicon as “federal might” may also feature in the contest.Of great concern, however, are some disturbing signs already emerging ahead of election day. There have been reports of political killings, violent clashes and acts of intimidation. Not surprisingly, all parties have been claiming to be victims, while none appears willing to accept responsibility. Such developments are dangerous because they create fear and tension among voters and raise concerns about the possibility of a peaceful election.The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. The outcome of this election could also shape political calculations ahead of the 2027 general elections. This is more than a state election; it is another important test of Nigeria’s democracy. The conduct of the election, more than even its outcome, will provide an indication of the country’s democratic maturity and the willingness of institutions to uphold the will of the people.Unlike elections in some other states where one candidate appears overwhelmingly dominant, this race in Osun appears genuinely competitive. The incumbent must be working hard not to be served the same bitter pill he served Oyetola four years ago. The candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Oyebamiji, and his supporters will also be determined to reclaim the state for the ruling party. Given that the APC controls the Federal Government, it is expected that what has come to be known in Nigeria’s political lexicon as “federal might” may also feature in the contest.Of great concern, however, are some disturbing signs already emerging ahead of election day. There have been reports of political killings, violent clashes and acts of intimidation. Not surprisingly, all parties have been claiming to be victims, while none appears willing to accept responsibility. Such developments are dangerous because they create fear and tension among voters and raise concerns about the possibility of a peaceful election.The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Unlike elections in some other states where one candidate appears overwhelmingly dominant, this race in Osun appears genuinely competitive. The incumbent must be working hard not to be served the same bitter pill he served Oyetola four years ago. The candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Oyebamiji, and his supporters will also be determined to reclaim the state for the ruling party. Given that the APC controls the Federal Government, it is expected that what has come to be known in Nigeria’s political lexicon as “federal might” may also feature in the contest.Of great concern, however, are some disturbing signs already emerging ahead of election day. There have been reports of political killings, violent clashes and acts of intimidation. Not surprisingly, all parties have been claiming to be victims, while none appears willing to accept responsibility. Such developments are dangerous because they create fear and tension among voters and raise concerns about the possibility of a peaceful election.The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Of great concern, however, are some disturbing signs already emerging ahead of election day. There have been reports of political killings, violent clashes and acts of intimidation. Not surprisingly, all parties have been claiming to be victims, while none appears willing to accept responsibility. Such developments are dangerous because they create fear and tension among voters and raise concerns about the possibility of a peaceful election.The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. The crisis surrounding the leadership of the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, including allegations of forceful takeovers, is also believed to be connected to the coming election. Just over the weekend, there was a reported invasion of an INEC office in the state, with hoodlums allegedly carting away Permanent Voter Cards. These are not developments that should be treated lightly. They strike at the very foundation of electoral integrity and should worry every lover of democracy.Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Violence cannot be justified in any sane society. In fact, violence is the enemy of democracy. Elections should not claim lives; rather, they should be contests of ideas, programmes and visions for development. Experience from past elections has shown that violence, or even the fear of violence, discourages voter participation. It undermines confidence in the process and damages the legitimacy of whoever is eventually declared the winner.It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. It is the responsibility of the Independent National Electoral Commission to ensure that it remains impartial in this election and in every other election for that matter. The commission must not only be neutral; it must also be clearly seen to be neutral. It must clear all doubts, whether genuine or perceived. INEC must protect election materials, secure sensitive documents, ensure transparent collation and resist pressure from any quarter. It is a known fact that the credibility of any contest depends significantly on the umpire, and in this case, the umpire is INEC.Related NewsOyebamiji victory non-negotiable – Barau’s aideINEC chair seeks Osun monarchs’ support to de-escalate tensionA’Court restores ADC, Atiku, Mark, Adeleke celebrateThe security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. The security agencies also have their roles clearly cut out for them. Like INEC, they must resist the temptation of being at the beck and call of interested parties. They must remain politically neutral, protect all voters equally, arrest offenders regardless of political affiliation and avoid acts capable of intimidating voters. Security personnel must inspire confidence, not fear. Their conduct before, during and after the election will greatly influence public perception of the process.The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. The political gladiators, in this case political parties, must also show restraint in both their actions and utterances. They must caution their candidates, party leaders and supporters. They should prevail on them to campaign peacefully, accept legitimate outcomes, avoid inflammatory rhetoric and abstain from political thuggery. Democracy thrives where political competition is conducted within the boundaries of civility and respect for the rules.Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Everybody has a role to play in ensuring that the election is successful. Traditional and religious leaders are no exception. They must preach peace, mediate where necessary, discourage violence and promote peaceful participation. Their voices carry weight in society, and they should deploy that influence in the service of peace and democracy.Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Above all, the election is about the people. They must be allowed to decide freely. No individual, group or institution should substitute its will for that of the electorate. The election belongs to the voters, and every vote must count.Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Experience has shown that credible elections reduce violence. Most post-election crises arise when people believe the process has been manipulated. On the other hand, when elections are free, fair and transparent, losers may be disappointed, but they are more likely to accept the outcome. A victory widely seen as reflecting the people’s choice enjoys greater legitimacy. The most effective way to prevent post-election violence, therefore, is not merely through security deployments but by ensuring that the most popular candidate, as determined by lawful votes, emerges victorious.The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. The greater lesson of this election is for Nigeria and not Osun State alone. The conduct of the Osun election will send a message about Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the effectiveness of its electoral reforms, the credibility of its institutions and the country’s readiness for future elections.As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. As August 15 approaches, every stakeholder must remember that elections are not wars to be won at all costs but democratic exercises through which the people freely choose their leaders. Osun deserves an election defined by ballots rather than bullets, persuasion rather than intimidation, and transparency rather than manipulation. INEC must remain impartial, security agencies must be professional, political actors must exercise restraint, and voters must be allowed to cast their ballots without fear.Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people. Ultimately, democracy works best when the people’s choice prevails. Where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible, even those who lose can find comfort in the legitimacy of the process. But where the will of the electorate is subverted, the seeds of violence are often sown. Osun must not become another cautionary tale. The state—and indeed Nigeria—deserves an election whose outcome reflects nothing more and nothing less than the freely expressed will of the people.