The commentary by the former Chief Press Secretary to Mr Samuel Ortom, and now Media Consultant to Mr Michael Aondoakaa, SAN, Dr Terver Akase, titled “Alia’s Attacks on Ortom, Aondoakaa Cannot Mask His Failure”, is long on political rhetoric but remarkably short on the evidence required to sustain its sweeping claims against the administration of Governor Hyacinth Alia.His attempt to portray Governor Alia as distracted, afraid, or unable to defend his record does not change the realities on the ground. If anything, the article reveals a line of opposition that appears unjustifiably disgruntled and increasingly uncomfortable with the administration’s performance, determined to turn every political conversation into another opportunity for allegations, fabrications and propaganda.It has become imperative to state clearly that increased federal revenue does not automatically translate into unlimited resources for state governments.During Ortom’s administration, many of his fellow governors who were willing to perform had to make the most of what they received from the Federation Account. Benue, under Ortom, was among the states that frequently cited paucity of funds as an excuse for underperformance.The Alia administration, on the other hand, has operated in an environment of unprecedented inflation, rising construction costs, insecurity, and other economic pressures. Therefore, quoting Federation Account Allocation Committee inflows without examining the corresponding cost of governance and development is a deliberately incomplete way to assess any government’s performance.More importantly, the former CPS, now a consultant, conveniently overlooks the Alia administration’s interventions in infrastructure, agriculture, education, healthcare, pensions, rural development, and other sectors. Benue people can see and assess these interventions for themselves, even if the consultant has chosen willful blindness over clear sight. The record of any government should be measured by what is visible and verifiable, not by the volume of criticism directed at it.On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor His attempt to portray Governor Alia as distracted, afraid, or unable to defend his record does not change the realities on the ground. If anything, the article reveals a line of opposition that appears unjustifiably disgruntled and increasingly uncomfortable with the administration’s performance, determined to turn every political conversation into another opportunity for allegations, fabrications and propaganda.It has become imperative to state clearly that increased federal revenue does not automatically translate into unlimited resources for state governments.During Ortom’s administration, many of his fellow governors who were willing to perform had to make the most of what they received from the Federation Account. Benue, under Ortom, was among the states that frequently cited paucity of funds as an excuse for underperformance.The Alia administration, on the other hand, has operated in an environment of unprecedented inflation, rising construction costs, insecurity, and other economic pressures. Therefore, quoting Federation Account Allocation Committee inflows without examining the corresponding cost of governance and development is a deliberately incomplete way to assess any government’s performance.More importantly, the former CPS, now a consultant, conveniently overlooks the Alia administration’s interventions in infrastructure, agriculture, education, healthcare, pensions, rural development, and other sectors. Benue people can see and assess these interventions for themselves, even if the consultant has chosen willful blindness over clear sight. The record of any government should be measured by what is visible and verifiable, not by the volume of criticism directed at it.On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor It has become imperative to state clearly that increased federal revenue does not automatically translate into unlimited resources for state governments.During Ortom’s administration, many of his fellow governors who were willing to perform had to make the most of what they received from the Federation Account. Benue, under Ortom, was among the states that frequently cited paucity of funds as an excuse for underperformance.The Alia administration, on the other hand, has operated in an environment of unprecedented inflation, rising construction costs, insecurity, and other economic pressures. Therefore, quoting Federation Account Allocation Committee inflows without examining the corresponding cost of governance and development is a deliberately incomplete way to assess any government’s performance.More importantly, the former CPS, now a consultant, conveniently overlooks the Alia administration’s interventions in infrastructure, agriculture, education, healthcare, pensions, rural development, and other sectors. Benue people can see and assess these interventions for themselves, even if the consultant has chosen willful blindness over clear sight. The record of any government should be measured by what is visible and verifiable, not by the volume of criticism directed at it.On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor During Ortom’s administration, many of his fellow governors who were willing to perform had to make the most of what they received from the Federation Account. Benue, under Ortom, was among the states that frequently cited paucity of funds as an excuse for underperformance.The Alia administration, on the other hand, has operated in an environment of unprecedented inflation, rising construction costs, insecurity, and other economic pressures. Therefore, quoting Federation Account Allocation Committee inflows without examining the corresponding cost of governance and development is a deliberately incomplete way to assess any government’s performance.More importantly, the former CPS, now a consultant, conveniently overlooks the Alia administration’s interventions in infrastructure, agriculture, education, healthcare, pensions, rural development, and other sectors. Benue people can see and assess these interventions for themselves, even if the consultant has chosen willful blindness over clear sight. The record of any government should be measured by what is visible and verifiable, not by the volume of criticism directed at it.On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor The Alia administration, on the other hand, has operated in an environment of unprecedented inflation, rising construction costs, insecurity, and other economic pressures. Therefore, quoting Federation Account Allocation Committee inflows without examining the corresponding cost of governance and development is a deliberately incomplete way to assess any government’s performance.More importantly, the former CPS, now a consultant, conveniently overlooks the Alia administration’s interventions in infrastructure, agriculture, education, healthcare, pensions, rural development, and other sectors. Benue people can see and assess these interventions for themselves, even if the consultant has chosen willful blindness over clear sight. The record of any government should be measured by what is visible and verifiable, not by the volume of criticism directed at it.On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor More importantly, the former CPS, now a consultant, conveniently overlooks the Alia administration’s interventions in infrastructure, agriculture, education, healthcare, pensions, rural development, and other sectors. Benue people can see and assess these interventions for themselves, even if the consultant has chosen willful blindness over clear sight. The record of any government should be measured by what is visible and verifiable, not by the volume of criticism directed at it.On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor On insecurity, it is unfortunate that the tragedy in Ayilamo was introduced principally as a political weapon. Every life lost to insecurity is painful, irrespective of political affiliation. Governor Alia has consistently treated insecurity as one of the most serious challenges facing the state. He has engaged the Federal Government and security agencies in efforts to protect communities and return displaced persons to their ancestral homes.The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor The apparent contradiction in the support Ortom is extending to both the incumbent President, Bola Tinubu, and the Labour Party candidate, Mr Peter Obi, also warrants clarification.It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor It is interesting to hear Ortom explain his position as statesmanship while acknowledging support for opposing presidential interests. If providing campaign logistics, including transportation, for Peter Obi is not political support but statesmanship, then Benue people are entitled to understand the principle guiding such a curious political arrangement.Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Away from this, perhaps the most revealing aspect of the commentary is the attempt to elevate Michael Kaase Aondoakaa’s campaign promises as though they were already achievements. At this point, Akase should tell Benue people what Aondoakaa achieved as Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, rather than presenting promises for an office he may never occupy as though they constitute an established record.Related News2027: My achievements will speak for me – Benue govASUU suspends strike at Benue varsity after four weeksMixed metaphors: Eating them youngAondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Aondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Aondoakaa should also be prepared to come clean on how he has managed his business interests, particularly MICAP Nigeria Limited, and the loans and other financial obligations associated with his businesses from commercial banks. This is not an accusation of wrongdoing; it is a call for the kind of openness that should naturally accompany anyone presenting himself as a credible alternative for public leadership. If one seeks the trust of the people, questions about business dealings, financial management and the ability to meet legitimate obligations should not be treated as inconvenient distractions.Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Making and keeping promises was nearly unattainable under Ortom. How, then, does Akase expect Benue people to simply accept that Chief Aondoakaa represents a completely different political proposition without subjecting his record, experience and public claims to the same scrutiny? Promising to secure farms, return IDPs, enforce laws, restore local government autonomy, and provide good governance is simply a promise, not performance.The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor The people of Benue are entitled to ask what concrete records those making these promises can present from their previous opportunities to serve the public. Political ambition should not erase history, and campaign rhetoric should not replace an honest examination of what candidates did when they previously had the opportunity to serve.Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Governor Alia, on the other hand, has an existing record that can be examined. His administration has undertaken reforms and projects, supported security efforts, pursued infrastructure development, strengthened agricultural initiatives, addressed pension and workers’ welfare concerns, and attracted investments to expand the state’s economic base. These are not promises for tomorrow; they are matters that can be examined against what has already been done.That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor That record is solid enough to earn credit, especially when compared with the previous administration’s performance. Those who seek to challenge Governor Alia should therefore be prepared to confront his record with facts rather than attempt to drown it in partisan spin.It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor It is also curious that Ortom, through his former spokesman, describes Alia as being afraid of Aondoakaa while devoting considerable attention to portraying Aondoakaa as a formidable political alternative. If the governor’s administration were truly as directionless and unpopular as suggested, the opposition would have little reason to spend so much energy constructing a narrative around his supposed fear.The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor The 2027 election will ultimately provide the appropriate platform for these competing claims. Benue voters will not need political writers to tell them what they have experienced. They will judge the Alia administration by what it has done, what it has delivered and what remains to be done. They will equally examine the records of those seeking to replace it and decide who deserves their confidence.Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Opposition politicians are free to campaign. Critics are free to scrutinise the government. But criticism should not replace evidence, just as campaign promises should not be mistaken for achievements.The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor The people of Benue are tired of noise without results. They are tired of recycled politicians who arrive every election season with mouthwatering promises. What they deserve now is leadership measured by results, accountability, and a clear understanding of the challenges confronting the state. Alia’s record should therefore be subjected to scrutiny, but it should not be distorted simply to serve partisan interests. In the end, the people will separate political spin from reality.Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor Sir Tersoo Kula is the Chief Press Secretary to the Benue State Governor
Alia’s record cannot be drowned in partisan spin
